Comments on: Transistor Revolution Review

By: Matt Fudge

Matt Fudge — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:25:10 +0000

Great review Oliver. Glad to hear you’ve enjoyed Transistor Revolution and you’ve made some valid points with your criticisms. A great collection of artist designed presets are something I would like to see in the future as well! Thanks for the comments Greg, it’s always good to know that my work is appreciated and that people are finding these instruments as useful as I am in their own work. Steve and Dan at Wave Alchemy have been really outstanding and are doing a great job promoting the product! I approached them earlier in the year with the newly designed instrument and they really helped with the refinement in the later stages of development to where it is now. I can honestly say that this product wouldn’t have turned out as strongly as it did without them.

By: Greg Mika

Greg Mika — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:08:36 +0000

“We must give back to Cesar what belongs to Cesar”
All the credits goes to Matthew Fudge, the canadian producer of this product => hxxp://soundsoutsidethelines.com
Wave Alchemy has just bought him back to make some money (as good british), they did nothing apart of marketing.
Hopefully, that will give the guy the payback he deserves. He’s a passionate doing that for years.
You can follow the making process of this product by doing a search at Gearslutz.
No need to say that his product (formerly Revolution 808 & Revolution 909) is brilliant with no comparison so far (check this => hxxps://soundcloud.com/mod-a/revolution-909-library-demo).
I have no affiliations with the guy, but I hate to see small entrepreneurs being forgotten in favor of the industry giants.

By: Oliver Chesler

Oliver Chesler — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:34:28 +0000

Transistor Revolution has the edge on pure sound but the D16s also clone the sequencer including a nice random mode.

By: ninety9

ninety9 — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:30:31 +0000

What do you feel the pros and cons are for them in comparison to d16′s clones?