Comments on: Archipod http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:48:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: petty vendetta http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34220 petty vendetta Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:49:29 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34220 Cover it in tinfoil and ma an orgone accumulator http://www.orgone.org/articles/ax2001-grnfld-aa.htm http://pettyvendetta.blogspot.com/ Cover it in tinfoil and ma an orgone accumulator http://www.orgone.org/articles/ax2001-grnfld-aa.htm

http://pettyvendetta.blogspot.com/

]]> By: Martin http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34203 Martin Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34203 Why not build a shed in the shape of a tetrahedron. Linear frequency response through the whole spectrum... From what I've read. Simpler construction too Why not build a shed in the shape of a tetrahedron. Linear frequency response through the whole spectrum… From what I’ve read.

Simpler construction too

]]> By: synthetic http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34201 synthetic Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:31:53 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34201 It would be difficult to find a worse acoustic environment than a sphere. Tap a balloon to find out why. The resonant frequency would make the room unusable. Would be tough to even have a conversation there, IMO. It would be difficult to find a worse acoustic environment than a sphere. Tap a balloon to find out why. The resonant frequency would make the room unusable. Would be tough to even have a conversation there, IMO.

]]> By: michal kiedron http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34199 michal kiedron Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:56:25 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34199 WRONG! I should learn to first think and write :) You'll gonna need just the quarter of that wavelength (cuz then the wave gots it's highest velocity) and that's given you're combining diffuser's with absorbers wich theoretically solves the problem and you need the sphere of around 8,5 meter + studio space diameter. Simpler solution might be putting fake, not parallel walls inside which solves the problem immediately but then it only looks cool from the outside :) Regards! WRONG! I should learn to first think and write :) You’ll gonna need just the quarter of that wavelength (cuz then the wave gots it’s highest velocity) and that’s given you’re combining diffuser’s with absorbers wich theoretically solves the problem and you need the sphere of around 8,5 meter + studio space diameter. Simpler solution might be putting fake, not parallel walls inside which solves the problem immediately but then it only looks cool from the outside :)
Regards!

]]> By: michal kiedron http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34197 michal kiedron Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:42:20 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34197 Well, you've put it perfectly right. And that's what's gonna happen in practise.. Maybe the fractal diffusors would help but then you would need the sphere of at least 34 meters diameter + space for actual studio (2X 17m - circa the wavelength of 20 Hz wave). Well, you’ve put it perfectly right. And that’s what’s gonna happen in practise.. Maybe the fractal diffusors would help but then you would need the sphere of at least 34 meters diameter + space for actual studio (2X 17m – circa the wavelength of 20 Hz wave).

]]> By: Rich Gavina http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34196 Rich Gavina Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:45:43 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34196 This is definitely one of the more interesting items you posted. I like the fact that its mobile. The price is pretty steep, but we're talking about adding an extra room to work and/or be creative (painting, music, etc.) without distractions. It may be worth the price based on that alone! Peace - R This is definitely one of the more interesting items you posted. I like the fact that its mobile. The price is pretty steep, but we’re talking about adding an extra room to work and/or be creative (painting, music, etc.) without distractions. It may be worth the price based on that alone!

Peace – R

]]> By: Alan Russell http://www.wiretotheear.com/2011/06/29/archipod/comment-page-1/#comment-34193 Alan Russell Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:57:10 +0000 http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=7479#comment-34193 I'm no acoustics expert either, but wouldn't the acoustics of a perfect sphere be very bad indeed? There would only be one axial room mode, the same 3m in every direction. That would mean a standing wave of... (digs out calculator)... about 112Hz (plus its harmonics). And if the standing wave is increased by addition 3 times in a cube (length, width, height) then wouldn't it be INFINITELY many times in a sphere? In practise, hopefully not. I think that might be perpetual motion... Even diffusion on the walls wouldn't help. In a sphere, everything reflects to a focal point in the centre. This is a weird problem. Anyone wanna geek out on it with me? I’m no acoustics expert either, but wouldn’t the acoustics of a perfect sphere be very bad indeed? There would only be one axial room mode, the same 3m in every direction. That would mean a standing wave of… (digs out calculator)… about 112Hz (plus its harmonics). And if the standing wave is increased by addition 3 times in a cube (length, width, height) then wouldn’t it be INFINITELY many times in a sphere? In practise, hopefully not. I think that might be perpetual motion…

Even diffusion on the walls wouldn’t help. In a sphere, everything reflects to a focal point in the centre.

This is a weird problem. Anyone wanna geek out on it with me?

]]>