<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming soon: A new music genre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1nfinitezer0</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>1nfinitezer0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=3729#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>This technology has felt like a game changer to me as well.  It&#039;s hard to guess how it might evolve new music.  The David Bowie portion of that video suggests DNA might find a home as an advanced sampler technique. Am I seeing right that it&#039;s extracted the overlapping phonemes?  Conceivably one could build a library of Bowie... and have him for text to speech?  Hmm... maybe the Bing &amp; Bowie album wish could come true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This technology has felt like a game changer to me as well.  It&#8217;s hard to guess how it might evolve new music.  The David Bowie portion of that video suggests DNA might find a home as an advanced sampler technique. Am I seeing right that it&#8217;s extracted the overlapping phonemes?  Conceivably one could build a library of Bowie&#8230; and have him for text to speech?  Hmm&#8230; maybe the Bing &amp; Bowie album wish could come true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saw</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-5475</link>
		<dc:creator>saw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=3729#comment-5475</guid>
		<description>well, arguably mash ups were happening on turn tables long before software... i heard DJ&#039;s in the 90s mixing &quot;anything&quot; into &quot;anything&quot; live on the decks many a time and heard things like The Who layered over some happy piano techno track plus some sesame street rhyme all mashed up when computers still had like a 64MB RAM maximum and laptops were but a fantasy.

and people were doing &#039;glitch&#039; by damaging CD&#039;s and playing them back and recording the results throwing them in a sampler then sequencing them w/their midi sequencer of choice... 

but that&#039;s all semantics i guess. and yeah.. i think your right about DNA.. probably will get over used in very obvious ways but will of course be a useful studio took for a lot of creative people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, arguably mash ups were happening on turn tables long before software&#8230; i heard DJ&#8217;s in the 90s mixing &#8220;anything&#8221; into &#8220;anything&#8221; live on the decks many a time and heard things like The Who layered over some happy piano techno track plus some sesame street rhyme all mashed up when computers still had like a 64MB RAM maximum and laptops were but a fantasy.</p>
<p>and people were doing &#8216;glitch&#8217; by damaging CD&#8217;s and playing them back and recording the results throwing them in a sampler then sequencing them w/their midi sequencer of choice&#8230; </p>
<p>but that&#8217;s all semantics i guess. and yeah.. i think your right about DNA.. probably will get over used in very obvious ways but will of course be a useful studio took for a lot of creative people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=3729#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>i saw a demo of this software at the Musikmesse in FFM. it seemed pretty cool, and it sounded good in their demo, but i cant imagine that the end product doesnt sound fairly processed and auto-tuned after a lot of tweaking....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw a demo of this software at the Musikmesse in FFM. it seemed pretty cool, and it sounded good in their demo, but i cant imagine that the end product doesnt sound fairly processed and auto-tuned after a lot of tweaking&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=3729#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know too much about Sonicworx Pro but it look like they&#039;re outpricing themselves at $1,849, Mac only.

Melodyne&#039;s editor will be $349 or $399, Windows and Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know too much about Sonicworx Pro but it look like they&#8217;re outpricing themselves at $1,849, Mac only.</p>
<p>Melodyne&#8217;s editor will be $349 or $399, Windows and Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheakypawl</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/09/20/coming-soon-a-new-music-genre/comment-page-1/#comment-5461</link>
		<dc:creator>cheakypawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=3729#comment-5461</guid>
		<description>what about this...?  http://www.prosoniq.com/editing-products/sonicworx/   they claim it is more advanced, better sounding and covers the whole mix, not just individual instruments... anyone beta-ing sonicworx?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about this&#8230;?  <a href="http://www.prosoniq.com/editing-products/sonicworx/" rel="nofollow">http://www.prosoniq.com/editing-products/sonicworx/</a>   they claim it is more advanced, better sounding and covers the whole mix, not just individual instruments&#8230; anyone beta-ing sonicworx?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
