Comments on: Retro vs Future audio producing technique videos.

By: Peter Morgan

Peter Morgan — Sat, 30 May 2009 19:53:29 +0000

Moog definitely

By: Raytrace

Raytrace — Wed, 20 May 2009 08:42:04 +0000

MOOG hands-down for me…

By: Oliver Chesler

Oliver Chesler — Wed, 20 May 2009 01:36:48 +0000

Thanks for the reply… nice software you wrote!

By: memo

memo — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:15:55 +0000

erm, being the developer of the above MSA Remote application, I can safely say…. the Moog setup anyday! (especially if combined with this http://www.audiovisualizers.com/toolshak/vidsynth/scanimat/scanimat.htm )

By: Document 02

Document 02 — Tue, 19 May 2009 08:07:26 +0000

Original Moog setup, but only if I can get a 2009 sequencer and MIDI to CV converter to go with it. If not the 2009 computer-iPhone setup seems more usable. Plus you can save your songs.

By: stiff

stiff — Tue, 19 May 2009 06:38:36 +0000

Nice idea. I’d pick the Moog setup of the two any day. Not comparing these two exact setups in particular, the feel of a real instrument is still really important to me. I don’t think that ITB composing is really there soundwise either, even if it’s been getting closer and closer for every year.

By: dominic

dominic — Tue, 19 May 2009 04:37:54 +0000

moog one for sure

By: digitalbeatsyndrome@yahoo.com

digitalbeatsyndrome@yahoo.com — Mon, 18 May 2009 22:21:05 +0000

I’d hold off for one of them multi touchscreen geegaws coming out soon.
I’d take a Jup 6 any day over the Moog..thats just me though.

By: Hannes

Hannes — Mon, 18 May 2009 20:23:54 +0000

even though I reveiced my ableton live 8 copy today… the moog setup for sure :)

By: Fabio

Fabio — Mon, 18 May 2009 19:47:56 +0000

the moog setup, for sure!