<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Start producing a song with effects 100% full on.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: myth</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=1809#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>I think you have a really good point here.  Also, another way to make the sound different is to set your sends to &quot;pre&quot; and just turn the volume for a track completely down and send everything through the effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a really good point here.  Also, another way to make the sound different is to set your sends to &#8220;pre&#8221; and just turn the volume for a track completely down and send everything through the effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gish</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/comment-page-1/#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>gish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=1809#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Changing the approac from time to time is indeed important. I also experimented with using drum pads for playing synths, instead of a typical keyboard. Switching the brain to another wavelenght. Same when starting with effects on. Although I&#039;m not too keen on reverbs ;) A stack of beat repeaters for everything but the vocals can create some nice mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing the approac from time to time is indeed important. I also experimented with using drum pads for playing synths, instead of a typical keyboard. Switching the brain to another wavelenght. Same when starting with effects on. Although I&#8217;m not too keen on reverbs ;) A stack of beat repeaters for everything but the vocals can create some nice mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Sandvik</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Sandvik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=1809#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think Phil Spector might like today&#039;s MacPros. There&#039;s something magical indeed to make big soundscapes with lots of effects, reverbs and so forth. A majority of film music has that sound, too. There&#039;s a place for minimalist arrangements, too.

Also, if all those effects overload the computer -- and there are some plugins that have badly written threading code so it takes over one core only -- there are always ways to just bounce the results and re-use them, or freeze the track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think Phil Spector might like today&#8217;s MacPros. There&#8217;s something magical indeed to make big soundscapes with lots of effects, reverbs and so forth. A majority of film music has that sound, too. There&#8217;s a place for minimalist arrangements, too.</p>
<p>Also, if all those effects overload the computer &#8212; and there are some plugins that have badly written threading code so it takes over one core only &#8212; there are always ways to just bounce the results and re-use them, or freeze the track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Sandvik</title>
		<link>http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/12/20/start-producing-a-song-with-effects-100-full-on/comment-page-1/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Sandvik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiretotheear.com/?p=1809#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think Phil Spector might like today&#039;s MacPros. There&#039;s something magical indeed to make big soundscapes with lots of effects, reverbs and so forth. A majority of film music has that sound, too. There&#039;s a place for minimalist arrangements, too.

Also, if all those effects overload the computer -- and there are some plugins that have badly written threading code so it takes over one core only -- there are always ways to just bounce the results and re-use them, or freeze the track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think Phil Spector might like today&#8217;s MacPros. There&#8217;s something magical indeed to make big soundscapes with lots of effects, reverbs and so forth. A majority of film music has that sound, too. There&#8217;s a place for minimalist arrangements, too.</p>
<p>Also, if all those effects overload the computer &#8212; and there are some plugins that have badly written threading code so it takes over one core only &#8212; there are always ways to just bounce the results and re-use them, or freeze the track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
